McCain claimed during the debate tonight that he would be a better Commander In Chief than Romney. He cited support from 4 Secretaries of State and many retired and active generals as his reasoning to believe that. That only tells me he's in the hip pocket of the military establishment. It is certainly no proof he would be a good Commander In Chief.
Actually most of the people he said supported him depend on war to secure faster promotions. If they're the ones supporting him, and as he previously stated that he believes the U.S. could be in Iraq and the Middle East
up to 100 years, it tells me he's more of a war-monger than someone that could and would lead us to victory.
No comments:
Post a Comment